<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lowering The Bar Pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/</link>
	<description>Philosophy of Mind and Sometimes More</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judah</title>
		<link>http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Judah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/#comment-504</guid>
		<description>Judah says : I absolutely agree with this !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judah says : I absolutely agree with this !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.G.</title>
		<link>http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>A.G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Yes, that might be true. Consider the point on memory though, this is what Dennett is famous for arguing for. He tries to undercut qualia by giving examples where tastes might shift or we can't decide between an immediate apprehension or memory. It might be the case as you say, which is what Dennett tries for, which means it might also not be the case for immediate apprehension which puts a big question mark on indubitibility.

thanks for visiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that might be true. Consider the point on memory though, this is what Dennett is famous for arguing for. He tries to undercut qualia by giving examples where tastes might shift or we can&#8217;t decide between an immediate apprehension or memory. It might be the case as you say, which is what Dennett tries for, which means it might also not be the case for immediate apprehension which puts a big question mark on indubitibility.</p>
<p>thanks for visiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://worldlyliving.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/lowering-the-bar-pt-2/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I think your argument is a good and interesting one. 

However, I think it could be argued that qualia may be experienced in a direct, infallible way at the moment they are experienced, and that the haziness and ambiguity which certainly arises. arises when they are transferred, either to a different, and perhaps more explicitly self-conscious level of consciousness, or just, via memory to later states.

I may have to do some more introspection to check!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your argument is a good and interesting one. </p>
<p>However, I think it could be argued that qualia may be experienced in a direct, infallible way at the moment they are experienced, and that the haziness and ambiguity which certainly arises. arises when they are transferred, either to a different, and perhaps more explicitly self-conscious level of consciousness, or just, via memory to later states.</p>
<p>I may have to do some more introspection to check!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
